Intelligent Security Architecture for Risk and Compliance
Abstract
Modern enterprises operate across distributed cloud environments, interconnected applications, data platforms, application programming interfaces, and increasingly autonomous digital services. This expanding technology landscape has introduced a broader range of security risks while making regulatory and compliance requirements more complex to manage. Conventional security architectures that rely primarily on predefined controls, periodic assessments, and manually maintained compliance processes are often insufficient for continuously changing enterprise environments. An intelligent security architecture provides a more adaptive approach by combining security analytics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, identity and access management, continuous monitoring, automated policy enforcement, and risk-based decision-making.
This article presents a generalized architecture for integrating intelligent security capabilities with enterprise risk and compliance management. The proposed approach considers security events, asset criticality, user and entity behavior, vulnerabilities, access privileges, configuration changes, regulatory requirements, and historical risk information as interconnected sources for security decision-making. Rather than treating security monitoring and compliance assessment as independent activities, the architecture establishes a continuous feedback mechanism in which detected events contribute to risk evaluation, risk assessments influence security controls, and compliance requirements are mapped to measurable technical and operational controls. Intelligent analytics can further support anomaly identification, risk prioritization, control effectiveness assessment, and early detection of potentially significant security conditions.
The article examines the major architectural components required to implement such a model, including data collection and normalization, security intelligence, risk analysis, policy management, compliance mapping, automated response, governance, and continuous assurance. It also discusses practical considerations related to data quality, model reliability, explainability, privacy, integration complexity, and human oversight. The resulting architecture provides a generalized foundation for organizations seeking to move from periodic and reactive security compliance practices toward continuous, risk-aware, and intelligence-driven security governance. Such an approach can improve visibility into enterprise risk, strengthen the consistency of security controls, and support more responsive compliance management across dynamic technology environments.
Article Information
Journal |
International Journal of Science, Research and Technology |
|---|---|
Volume (Issue) |
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Science, Research and Technology (IJSRAT) |
DOI |
|
Pages |
11373-11380 |
Published |
January 11, 2024 |
| Copyright |
All rights reserved |
Open Access |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite |
Sapthagiri Padmanabham (%2024). Intelligent Security Architecture for Risk and Compliance. International Journal of Science, Research and Technology , Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Science, Research and Technology (IJSRAT) , pp. 11373-11380. https://doi.org/10.15662/ykpznf55 |
References
[2] International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, ISO/IEC 23894:2023: Information Technology—Artificial Intelligence—Guidance on Risk Management, Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 2023.
[3] Joint Task Force, Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations, NIST Special Publication 800-53, Rev. 5, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2020. doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-53r5.
[4] Joint Task Force, Assessing Security and Privacy Controls in Information Systems and Organizations, NIST Special Publication 800-53A, Rev. 5, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Jan. 2022.
[5] International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, ISO/IEC 27001:2022: Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection—Information Security Management Systems—Requirements, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
[6] Center for Internet Security, CIS Critical Security Controls v8, Center for Internet Security, East Greenbush, NY, USA, 2021.
[7] M. Sewak, S. K. Sahay, and H. Rathore, “Deep reinforcement learning for cybersecurity threat detection and protection: A review,” 2022.
[8] F. W. Bentrem, M. A. Corsello, and J. J. Palm, “Leveraging sharing communities to achieve federated learning for cybersecurity,” 2021.
[9] A. Barredo Arrieta, N. Díaz-Rodríguez, J. Del Ser, A. Bennetot, S. Tabik, A. Barbado, S. García, S. Gil-Lopez, D. Molina, R. Benjamins, R. Chatila, and F. Herrera, “Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI,” Information Fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82–115, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.
[10] A. Vassilev, A. Oprea, A. Fordyce, and H. Anderson, Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations, NIST AI 100-2 E2023, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2023/2024.